Title

Why what? Why you are clueless? Dude, read your arguments. Start with the first one.

Comparing the elegant and effortless action of the guy in the video catching the clam in 20 second to what?

To your pretentious description of what ”people with experience” usually have to do – namely deploy a bunch of tools and actions. Which in itself is an illogical argument – just look at the f*cking video. Do you honestly think the guy is not experienced?

Yet the real kicker is what you disingenuously determine from this flawed attempt to know better, namely that the guy is being sloppy. In which way is he sloppy? That is such a stupid conclusion, it made me question your ability for coherent thought. Hence my first commentary.

Now, you address that with a statement that is also devoid of logic. The assumption that either you or I are braindead – well, that may or may not be true. However, the reasoning why it would or could be so, is … the argument seems stupid? Even if it actually would be a stupid argument, how do you come from there to either of us being braindead? But than again, you don’t know if it actually is stupid, because you didn’t understand it. And please, do not claim irony. Your reasoning is implausible already.

Maybe you think I attacked you as a person. I didn’t. I challenged you to look hard at your argument and maybe understand where you erred. And finally: I look at the number of downvotes on my first comment and with a sigh of relief I realize: you are not alone in here with a deficit in coherent thinking. You have plenty of comrades …

Be good. Ach what the hell: be best!