MERHABA 🙂
Manuel yazmanın bir dinozor haline gelip gelmediğini merak etmeye başlıyorum. Kendim veya serbest çalışanlara dış kaynak kullanımı yazıyorum, ancak daha fazla AI tarafından oluşturulan makaleler görüyorum ve geçiş yapmayı düşünüyorum – esas olarak zaman ve maliyet nedenleri için.
Uygulamada nasıl ele alıyorsunuz, hala elle mi yazıyorsunuz, hibrid bir kurulum kullanıyor musunuz veya% 100 AI’ya mı gidiyorsunuz?
Makaleleri kendi başlarına “yazan” birkaç WordPress eklentisini test ettim, ancak sonuçlar vasattı. Daha fazla baktığımızda, tüm bir arada çözümler (yazma, görüntüler, etiketler, otomatik yayınlama), örneğin Seorise.ai buldum. Burada kimse kullandı mı? Gerçek dünyadaki artılar/eksiler nelerdir, neye dikkat etmeliyim ve AI her şeyi tek başına yazarsa içerik kalitesi nasıl?

I don’t write articles personally, but our writers use a hybrid approach. You shouldn’t trust AI alone, at least some manual verification is needed.
It depends on the topic.
AI is great for outlines and titles.
For original articles is crap.
Hah, I was just commenting about this very topic on LinkedIn.
In the 2000s, I wrote a lot of content for my SEO blog, our newsletter, and print and online publications.
It was a LOT of work!
I even had a single afternoon a week when every employee had to write a piece of content for our newsletter… and I have to say, it worked like a charm.
I’m trying to get back into the habit of writing more. That said, I am 100% going to get assistance from AI to keep the volume while I utilize my expertise to keep the quality high.
So, yes, use AI (IMO). Just be really careful to double-check your work, give credit where it is due (when sourcing info), and power up the content with incredible insights from your own head wherever humanly possible.
I think you need to incorporate AI in your workflow to keep up with all of the writing that needs to be done if you’re trying to build a brand.
Drafting articles , posts, and newsletters is a lot of work on its own.
Not to mention editing and final copy. To be able to do much of this at scale is a necessity and can only be done by hiring more people or using AI.
So if it helps your writing output, then I say use it.
A little bit of AI and a lot of personal touch
I do both.
Hey 🙂 I say go hybrid. Let AI handle ideation/outlines/first drafts, then add human sourcing, examples, and edits. Publish fewer, better pieces with receipts. That aligns with Google’s guidance (helpful content is fine, “scaled content abuse” isn’t) and with research showing AI can speed you up without replacing editorial judgment.
It’s not about using just your hands or just AI. Take it like AI is pivotal for most of the things, if not all. I use it as a helping hand to be faster and more accurate in draft flow. It’s all about the depth of your prompt and details. You can always use it for the bits and pieces, or go full warrior with it, depending on the nature and objective of your website.
AI is not fully good for quality SEO work
So we as an agency prefer to outline and do research via AI
And write human content
Human written content is still preferred for SEO as compared to AI written content
Use a hybrid approach:
AI models for title and header tags, TOC, key takeaways, body outline, CTA buttons, faqs, internal linking, etc.
Human intervention and oversight for everything else…
I was writing about something similar on LinkedIn today. But specifically on using AI for listacles.
AI makes it too easy to write them. The same “Top 10” formats are everywhere. And most of them are repetitive, outdated, and filled with fake stats, prices, or tools no one uses anymore.
And this is where real writing comes in. Writers can stand out by:
-Adding real examples (your own screenshots, use cases, and reviews)
-Including honest tradeoffs (not just features)
-Pairing your list with a short demo or video deep-dive
People don’t want another list. They have plenty of those. But they do want the confidence to make a decision. When you write content like this, there’s no competition with AI.
Its a matter of choice sometimes and sometimes mainly in YMYL niches like medical field, investment and all you need to have knowledge and write it by your own mannually.
Unless YMYL is your niche Its the command and training that matters while content generation. Everyone uses AI and its the best to research and do 90 percent of your work the rest 10 percent depends if you gonna use the info to write it in your own words or proofread it. in my site I do affiliate marketing via blogs and I am a marketing student and a digital marketer who offers services. So I do have a decent knowledge of sales. And I use my knowledge in research and crafting a content. So for mr the 10 percent is proof reading and adding info graphics. This way I gain more knowledge and also correct some errors or short comings from AI content.
Rank analysis and calculate formatting by script, research and citations by ai… draft by person, edited for style and grammar by ai, onpage analysis check, edit and publish.
Hybrid approach, AI as foundation, but always fact checked and manually adapted.
[deleted]