DefinedMotion adlı programlı animasyonlar için bir GitHub depom var. Bu 5 aydır çıktı ve sorgunun hassasiyetine bakılmaksızın Google’da hala görünmüyor. Bing, Yahoo ve DuckDuckgo’daki ilk öğe gibi görünüyor, bu yüzden bu garip.
Herhangi bir hassas içerik içermez ve asla sahip olmadığı. Bu sadece normal bir GitHub deposu.
Kelimenin tam anlamıyla ararken "Exact_link" (Gerçek bağlantıları kullanmama izin verilmiyor gibi görünmüyorum R/SEO) alıntılarda, Google’da depodan yalnızca bir niş taahhüt günlük sitesi görünür.
Bu garip ve düzeltmek istiyorum. Herhangi bir tür hedefli dışlama veya bunun gibi bir şey olduğunu sanmıyorum. Muhtemelen sadece teknik bir sorun.
Depoyu bulmak istiyorsanız, bu Reddit hesabındaki diğer yayınlarımı kontrol edin veya arayın "Tanımlamalı" diğer arama motorlarında.
At this point, Google believes that “DefinedMotion” is query to ask what the definition of “motion” is. Bing’s results aren’t terribly different but they don’t seem to have the same error correction or still has more exact match systems in place than Google.
I also noticed if I typed “definedmotion animation” that lead to motion graphics related information more definitions so other search engines aren’t too far of the concensus.
Lastly, when I type “definedmotion github” the 2nd result was this very reddit post.
So from a Google point of view, this is going to be tough.
Additionally, you’ll need to also look into or consider how many people are going to be looking for your repo under it’s actual name?
There are typically some under the hood things you could do such as disambiguationDescription schema, but I’m uncertain if github allows for that sort of schema data to be applied in their readme.md.
The first thing is simply more links to your repo preferably using “DefinedMotion” in the anchor to build authority and help Google understand that your repo’s name is not a mispelling but an actual thing. For additional authority, getting more stars, forks, and watches could potentially be a signal of popularity and quality.
Additionally, use “DefinedMotion” in your readme.md more. Instead of “This is a programmatic animation library, similar to 3Blue1Brown’s Manim or Motion Canvas.” use “DefinedMotion is a programmatic animation library, similar to 3Blue1Brown’s Manim or Motion Canvas.” You need to drive home the insistence that this page is about DefinedMotion, and not just another random page about the definition of “motion”.
FYI: when posting links, just disable the actual link so just the URL displays as text.