SEO firmamız sitemiz için ayda 5 makale yazıyor ve son zamanlarda Siteyi Copyleaks aracılığıyla çalıştırmak, ortak AI terimleri nedeniyle AI ile%84+ eşleşme gösteriyor.
% 100 AI olarak geri dönen 1 serbest içerik yazarımız var ve eserleri% 0 AI geri gelen başka bir yazımız var -% 0 AI, bir insan olarak, aslında en az okumayı seviyorum …
Bu ortak AI cümlelerini tanımlayan ancak sadece bunları değiştiren herhangi bir site var mı?
Why not just pay them?
AI filters don’t work
Detectors are noisy—don’t chase a % score. There isn’t a good ‘auto replace AI phrases’ tool that won’t turn prose into thesaurus soup. Better fix: make a banned-phrases list (e.g., *in today’s fast-paced world, leverage, unlock, delve, landscape, moreover, additionally, in conclusion*), batch find/replace, then do a human edit for voice + specifics (numbers, examples, sources). If you need tools, use rewriters (Wordtune/QuillBot) sparingly and run drafts through a style pass (Hemingway/Grammarly). The real win is an editorial style guide and prompts that force concrete detail, not detectors.
Why are you even bothering (wasting time) and actually paying money for something like Copyleaks? Google’s said time and time again that they don’t care whatsoever if the content is written by AI or not.
I have content I personally wrote 10-20 years ago that’s flagged as being “written by AI”. Who cares, really?
Google doesn’t care about AI content. BUT what they DO care about is if the content on your page (or on your site) offers more than what every other site offers. That could be a different perspective, additional content, whatever.
This to me is a waste of time. You can train ai to write in any style. I would think your “copyleaks” not familiar with it could show false positives. Be careful with these tools, maybe not as reliable as you think.
We write all of our client copy with ai and then human edit. I would think most seo companies do it this way these days??