Merhaba,
Yapay zeka ile bir makale oluşturup onu Google’da sıralayabilir miyim?
Google’ın umurunda mı?
Yapay zeka tarafından oluşturulan içeriği sıralayabilir misiniz?
5 Yorum
Yorum Yaz
Yorum yapabilmek için oturum açmalısınız.
Merhaba,
Yapay zeka ile bir makale oluşturup onu Google’da sıralayabilir miyim?
Google’ın umurunda mı?
Yorum yapabilmek için oturum açmalısınız.
Kod e‑postana gönderildi. (24 saat geçerli)
[removed]
Hello! Recently, Ahrefs published a study (I won’t share a direct link to avoid moderation issues, but it’s easy to find). They analyzed a large number of websites that use for whole the texts, use for part of the texts, and don’t use AI at all for content creation.
Interestingly, Ahrefs didn’t find a clear correlation between AI-generated content and content written manually in terms of performance. I’m curious if anyone here has seen more recent or updated studies that look at this topic in more detail?
Yes, I exclusively publish mass generated AI content at scale, as in thousands of articles at a time across dozens and dozens of sites.
Google doesn’t love it, though they barely send any content sites clicks these days anyway, but Bing, Yahoo, DDG, and Ecosia are absolutely fine with it and still send traffic to websites in surprisingly high numbers and they love to rank content around long tail keywords.
Yes, I’ve created articles using AI that get thousands of clicks every month. I don’t recommend generating an entire article in one go though.
**Fact**: Google will penalize sites for use of AI content.
Even the pro-AI content folks have to acknowledge that reality, no matter what Google says in publications or elsewhere*.
So the question becomes- how to use AI content in such a way that it *avoids* a penalty. And at what point are you likely to trigger some kind of negative consequence from Google (value of a page being wiped out, value of domain being impacted, actual penalty, etc). Remember that Google operates at an enormous scale without lots of manual intervention so its crucial that (a) if Google does penalize AI content in some scenarios, (b) you don’t accidentally get caught up in whatever automated dragnet they produce.
Most SEOs exist on some kind of “humanize your content” spectrum with the above in mind, even the ones who are AI-content penalty deniers. I’ve seen a few in this forum who are “pro-AI content for ranking” and “anti-Google cares about quality” who get muddy when trying to explain why they take the approach they do with humanizing/editing AI content.
**Two truths for SEOs to remember- Google often announces one thing and privately does another, especially when they feel that not doing so will result in broader manipulation of the algorithm. And, being anti-AI content publicly creates problems for Google’s business and share value, so they are unlikely to ever strongly take that stance.*