Google’ın, daha uzun, daha iyi akan, daha fazla görsele sahip, daha bilgilendirici, daha eğlenceli, iyi yazılmış içeriğin üstüne kesinlikle hiç görsel içermeyen, inanılmaz derecede düşük çaba gerektiren bir makaleyi sıralaması çok çılgınca.
SEO’yu ne kadar çok yaparsam, Google’ın “Kaliteli içeriğin” ne anlama geldiğini bilmediğini o kadar çok fark ediyorum
4 Yorum
Yorum Yaz
Yorum yapabilmek için oturum açmalısınız.

tell me if you understood this before or not. what ranks at top on serp for each keyword or longtails were tested by google. they allowed millions of urls to rank on top, then measuring how search users interacted with the website each visited, based on these data they rank the most suitable urls that gives their search users to their favor, whatever it is. so it means you create a novel about something that your targeted kw doesnt need (search user decided that by not visiting similar urls with your type of novels) so what will rank? good content? whatever content that makes people come back to use google.
[removed]
True, what even is “good content”. You can’t make “good content”. That is for people to decide and drop their vote of confidence through clicks and backlinks. You can however control keyword targeting (selection and prioritisation) and link building (external and internal), and THAT is what counts.
I know. I writer really good, meaningful content – but that takes time. My competitors put out ten pieces of AI slop in that time. Guess who wins?