Tiktok’taki bir AI gönderisinde bu yorumu buldum
Görünüşe göre web geliştiricileri zaten saf müşterileri LLM aramasında görünür olmak için şemaya “yatırım” / daha hızlı yarış şeritlerine “yatırım” yapıyor – bu çok kalitesiz ve yanlış….
Şema çok temeldir ve uygulaması çok spesifiktir, ancak şema gerçekten sadece biraz veri sağlar. Detayları yayınlayan bir kitap gibi ama BT arkadaşları kitabın içeriğini sağlar. Veya bir blog yayınları yayınlayan ayrıntılar – HTML’den çıkarılabilen – ancak içeriğin doğruluğu, kalitesi, boyutu, yararlılığı konusunda hiçbir etkisi olmayan – aslında şemanın içeriği ile hiçbir ilgisi yoktur…
Bence bu son derece açık. Bence Markoip dillerinin bunu yapabileceğini düşünmek müşterilerin süper saf olduğunu – HEML’nin başlamak için bir işaretleme dili olduğu göz önüne alındığında….
Bu, SEO’lar için Web geliştiricileri değil, daha fazla SEO mitlerine bakıyoruz.
You’re silly if you think this is how web devs are making money…
Schema just helps communicate information with crawlers easier. Every bit helps, and it doesn’t take long to set up.
I don’t understand your point
schema is incredibly basic and as such all websites should be analyzed so everything that should have a schema has it.
Why wouldn’t AI’s use schemas when they parse a site? since it’s easy to read for them as the information is very clearly organized – and before AI’s we had search bots like the google crawlbot.
This just seems like all sites should do it same as website speed improvement cause… why not?
Makes total sense to me that you’d do everything you can to help search engines and AI tools understand your content 🤷
For blog content, yeah, implementing schema probably isn’t going to move the needle much.
But not everything is a blog. You might have a very complicated product or set of IP with non-obvious relationships and properties, and why make the crawlers guess about those relationships when you could just spell it out?
It’s not that hard to implement this stuff, so even if the upside is unknown, there’s almost 0 downside.
Can ANYONE please point me to a schema course?? I just don’t get it. I’m studying SEO now. I get the basics but when you go in there’s like, maybe 20 categories that you can label something as. I’m assuming I’m totally missing something and on the wrong path. Again, still learning.
Lots of comments here defending schema. Personally, I’m in agreement with u/WebLinkr. LLMs don’t need it and don’t really use it. Very very little value (if any?) in spending time on implementing it. Maybe it was useful in 2007 when crawlers/parsers were kind of dumb and could use all the help they could get, but they have evolved considerably and have no problem parsing/understanding/indexing your content from the HTML.
Schema is only useful for the SERP features it triggers in Google: recipes, review stars, FAQs, but sadly, they took the FAQs from us, and they don’t show the other features for most businesses.
[removed]
Schema has been around for ages, it’s not a new thing but I could see people using it as a gimmick.
I’ve seen a direct positive impact of schema on sites i.e. for local organic ranking factors, review schema (having 5 stars/review count appear in SERP). It’s not a game changer, but is just a way to help interpret data and parse results.