Günlük olarak haberleri ve güncellemeleri kapsayan bir futbol web sitem var. Makalelerimi Chatgpt ve Copilot üzerine yazmayı planlıyorum. Google’ın yapay zeka oluşturulan içeriği doğrudan cezalandırmadığını biliyorum, ancak bu makaleler aynı anahtar kelimeler için diğer içeriğe karşı nasıl performans gösterecek? İçerik AI’mın% 90’ı üretilirse makalelerimi günlük olarak sıralayabilir miyim?
Ayrıca, Google AdSense yapay zeka oluşturulan makalelerde reklamları caydırıyor mu?
AI can help you write, but if you just copy-paste ChatGPT’s Sunday match wrap-ups, you’ll get outranked by a dude in his mom’s basement who added one spicy opinion and a player rating graphic
Yes, if the website is strong enough.
Use ChatGPT as a guide, then do your own edits to give it a personal touch.
You basically just told us “I’m going to make crap content, will I rank?”
Do better.
IMO, this really depends on the overall strength and authority of the site to begin with. If you have a solid foundation, a good following or brand in place, a published product (even if it’s just information) that doesn’t rely solely on search traffic, AI assisted content can be very productive and helpful, assuming you hand-edit it and humanize it to your own messaging. (IE: Relate it to you, your brand, your website, I, we, me, my, us, our, your own voice, etc)
If you’re using AI generated content with the hopes of attracting search visitors alone, with no other signals to tell search you have a community or brand, and signals that your users like your content, it won’t help much at all in the long run and may have a negative effect.
As far as I know, Adsense doesn’t care, as long as its not thin, MFA type content. (Same as human written MFA content) Again, just my +20-year opinion, but if users are coming directly from search, reading for 20-30 seconds and clicking on an ad, that’s not a great feedback signal to search. If your overall percentage of traffic from search is higher than 50-60%, same thing.
Time can be saved by using ChatGPT and Copilot, but Google prioritizes quality. Your material can still score highly if it is valuable, optimized, and original. As long as AI material complies with quality standards, AdSense is fine with it. Put your readers’ needs first!
Ask Ai to seo optimise your chosen keywords. It doesn’t matter if the content makes no sense. All google wants is keywords to rank. Google does not prioritise quality. You could have the worst content on the planet it doesn’t matter.
Can you share link to your website, want to see what your website looks like
the odds of it ranking either way might be slim
There is no way you can write better than ChatGPT anyway. Might as well use something that is designed specifically to write stuff.
Hi everyone,
I recently noticed something strange in Google Search Console. On June 1st, there was a huge increase in “Crawled – currently not indexed” URLs on my site, and at the same time, the total number of indexed pages dropped significantly (see attached screenshot).
I checked the URLs marked as “Crawled – not indexed” and randomly tested a few of them. They are normal, working links and even got indexed again after submitting for re-crawl manually.
My site structure hasn’t changed. Pages are accessible and follow best practices (canonical tags, robots.txt, etc.). Has anyone experienced something similar recently? Could this be a temporary issue with Google’s indexing system, or is there something I should fix?
Any advice would be appreciated!
Checked his profile. He has a soccer website.
AI generated doesn’t or shouldn’t mean that you leave the entire production process entirely up to ChatGPT or whatever AI you are using. You need to fact check the information and to resolve User Intent, basically, fall back to Search Goal Completion again, otherwise you are not gonna provide anything of value, particularly with the whole CTR crisis thanks to AI Overviews by Google.
AI content can work really well.
I just shared 7 writing instructions you can feed into ChatGPT to get content that is more likely to rank well as well as be cited in LLMs. It’s in my post history.
It includes things like:
* Using specificity over generalities
* Formatting content for semantic understanding
* Optimizing subordinate text after headings