Hey millet, bu konuda ne düşüneceğimi bilmiyorum. Son zamanlarda LLMS.txt’nin işe yaramaz olduğunu duydum – ama biliyor musunuz, Google bunu kendi sayfasına eklesin mi?
Tam bağlam için Barry Shwartz gönderisine bakın: https://x.com/rustybrick/status/1996192945486111193/photo/1
Peki John Mueller’in yanıtı? Bu konuda ne düşünüyorsun?
Yup – posted this earlier to r/SEO_Digital_Marketing
Johnmu’s reply on Blue Sky was funny
If the page is linked and LLMS read it – then its a cheap way to send them to other URLs to syntehsize
I am quite flummoxed about this news. At the same time, the Googlers who are spokespersons for search are not the ones who manage the Google sites and products. Then again, it wouldn’t be the first time what Googlers tell SEOs is different from what actually happens IRL.
Then again, until more major AI platforms specifically say they are leveraging the txt file, I’m going to continue to ignore llms.txt.
Your post/comment has been removed because your account has low post karma.
Please contribute more positively on Reddit overall before posting. Cheers 😀
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SEO) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It’s all about backlinks, forget the llms.txt. That won’t move the needle.
Why are people so obsessed over this file? What is a use case for this? How would this improve how engines or agents understand your site?
People want to believe in a magic key, a secret button, a hidden switch that “makes” you visible.
SEO isn’t complex. SEO isn’t impossible.
SEO is a struggle, especially if you cannot separate reality from what needs to be done
SEO can be hard work. SEO can be routine.
[u/rustybrick](https://x.com/rustybrick)
does a great job in highlighting this in his quote from
[u/johnmu](https://x.com/johnmu)
about consistency being critical in Technical SEO….
SEO can be a challenge – from time to time.
Thats why its important for SEO thought leaders to help SEO newbies understand theory from practicality.
Its why we have to protect communities from branded disinformation and propaganda.
Things like saying AI/LLM tools are search engines and have the ability to have their own search ranking model is complete nonsense.
So is making up SEO myths and superstitions.
So is making up SEO checklists when we’re clearly in a system.
I’m not here to predict the future of SEO. Thats up to search engines like Google, bing, DDG, whoever.
But I will challenge SEO and GEO FUD.