CHATGPT neden web sitelerine% 52 daha az sevk trafiği gönderiyor ve neredeyse sadece Wikipedia, Reddit ve Techradar’a atıfta bulunuyor? Openai, atıf ağırlığını manuel olarak değiştirdi ve şimdi “ilk cevap” platformları tüm sevgiyi alıyor, markalı siteler pratik olarak görünmez.
Yayıncılar ve pazarlamacılar, AI cevaplarının tıklamaların yerini aldığı bir dünyada nasıl rekabet ediyor? Düşüncelerinizi, teorilerinizi veya korku hikayelerinizi aşağıda bırakın.
How are you able to identify/attribute traffic from/to ChatGPT?
Not really. I did a quick check on 6 different sites and they got more or less the same traffic from ChatGPT, with one doubling the previous month and getting close to Bing. However, this last one got less traffic from Perplexity. Not that there’s a correlation, but I just found it curious.
However, based on the sources you mention, it is possible that you were cited on subjects that require a lot of authority, or that your site was included among a group of other sites. (Note: I have no idea what to call that widget with all the sources shown like a carousel. If anyone knows, please tell.)
What does your site have for content?
Is it “semantically aligned”?
ChatGPT seems to be building results into its own cache for repeat questions….but once you ge4t listed, you last longer – unlike Perplexity ~~or Viagra~~