Google’ın şu anda öneriye dayalı web sitelerini nasıl değerlendirdiğinden emin değilim.
Bu yürüttüğüm bir test projesi: codzisobejrzec.pl
İçerik insan tarafından düzenlenir ancak tutarlı bir yapı izler.
Deneyimlerinize göre: • Bu zaten sınırda zayıf içerik mi? • Güncel otoriteyi güçlendirmek için ilk olarak neyi eklersiniz? • Daha fazla metin mi, daha fazla şema mı, yoksa tamamen başka bir şey mi?
Her türlü dürüst geri bildirimi takdir ederiz 🙏
Schema is not magic. It has specific purposes but it doesnt make content amazing or authoritative. Some people see some benefit and have invented Schema Worship – a cult within Dev SEO
>I’m unsure how Google currently evaluates recommendation-based websites.
It doesnt really ‘evaluate” sites and it certainly doesnt have categories – except broad terms like YMYL (which are actually quite narrrow – like Affiliate and Vaccine sites for example)
>Content is human-edited but follows a consistent structure.
So – look at most pSEO sites like Indeed or Zillow etc
Most of the time this question is rooted in “Duplicate” and “Machine scaled” content.
1) Duplicate content is not an issue for Google- it just prefers not to index a lot of them.
But if your pages are ” Top [house types] in [city] in [state name] State” – then these are largely unique pages
However – indexing, indexation rates and position in indices is set by authority…
Also, thin content isn’t a real thing cos word count isn’t a thing
In some movies, you have empty descriptions, and I don’t mean meta descriptions.
You may want to fill that out.