Kaydol

Flood göndermek, insanların floodlarını okumak ve diğer insanlarla bağlantı kurmak için sosyal Floodlar ve Flood Yanıtları Motorumuza kaydolun.

Oturum aç

Flood göndermek, insanların floodlarını okumak ve diğer insanlarla bağlantı kurmak için sosyal Floodlar ve Flood Yanıtları Motorumuza giriş yapın.

Şifremi hatırlamıyorum

Şifreni mi unuttun? Lütfen e-mail adresinizi giriniz. Bir bağlantı alacaksınız ve e-posta yoluyla yeni bir şifre oluşturacaksınız.

3 ve kadim dostu 1 olan sj'yi rakamla giriniz. ( 31 )

Üzgünüz, Flood yazma yetkiniz yok, Flood girmek için giriş yapmalısınız.

Lütfen bu Floodun neden bildirilmesi gerektiğini düşündüğünüzü kısaca açıklayın.

Lütfen bu cevabın neden bildirilmesi gerektiğini kısaca açıklayın.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

BTRFS or ext4 in 2021?

I know btrfs has had a bad reputation in the past, but is it any good for usage today?

What are you people personally using?

Benzer Yazılar

Yorum eklemek için giriş yapmalısınız.

7 Yorumları

  1. For single drive filesystems (important): If you want features (i.e. snapshots), go with BTRFS. For speed, go to phoronix and find more data than you want. There’s no particular reason to avoid either for single drive filesystems.

    For RAID, you probably don’t want either (certainly not BTRFS). Assuming you aren’t distributing your system, there shouldn’t be any issue with ZFS (although Oracle could do a number on Linux ZFS support at any moment).

  2. I use btrfs for my root fs. Mainly because it is a match made in heaven with timeshift.

    For data I use ext4, mergerfs and snapraid.

  3. ZFS and XFS.

    ​

    ext4 has limitations with maximum partition size that XFS does not, and XFS root partition is noticeably faster on the same hardware. You lose the ability to shrink filesystem/partition size, but honestly who does that anymore? Most resizes are expansions in my experience.

    ​

    If you do a full bare-metal backup with **fsarchiver**, you can even restore in-place ext4 to xfs. All you should need to do is modify **/etc/fstab** in the restored FS before rebooting, but carry a super grub / rescatux ISO just in case.

    Code here:

    [https://github.com/kneutron/ansitest/blob/master/VIRTBOX/RESTORE-fsarchive-root-xfs.sh](https://github.com/kneutron/ansitest/blob/master/VIRTBOX/RESTORE-fsarchive-root-xfs.sh)

  4. Why not OpenZFS 2.0? Quite mature and better than both IMO.

  5. I went with ext4 instead of btrfs for the large (50+TB) data volume because of speed, stability and reliability. I still prefer btrfs for root because of snapshots and compression.
    I just had too many broken btrfs stuff in the past years so I don’t trust it with my important data. (Stuff like forced read only after disk is full, unrepairable files (by scrub) which could only be solved by a fresh formatting among other annoying stuff like metadata full, days of balancing)

  6. Depends of your usage, both are solid these days and will everything you need. Btrfs just has lot of bells and whistles.

  7. I think the consensus these days is it’s good for single drive and raid 1. But still iffy on high raid levels. But lots of people use it and I believe it’s the filesystem synology uses by default. Personally I wouldn’t risk it with my high value data but I’m sure there is someone out there that has had a great experience with long term use.