Kaydol

Flood göndermek, insanların floodlarını okumak ve diğer insanlarla bağlantı kurmak için sosyal Floodlar ve Flood Yanıtları Motorumuza kaydolun.

Oturum aç

Flood göndermek, insanların floodlarını okumak ve diğer insanlarla bağlantı kurmak için sosyal Floodlar ve Flood Yanıtları Motorumuza giriş yapın.

Şifremi hatırlamıyorum

Şifreni mi unuttun? Lütfen e-mail adresinizi giriniz. Bir bağlantı alacaksınız ve e-posta yoluyla yeni bir şifre oluşturacaksınız.

3 ve kadim dostu 1 olan sj'yi rakamla giriniz. ( 31 )

Üzgünüz, Flood yazma yetkiniz yok, Flood girmek için giriş yapmalısınız.

Lütfen bu Floodun neden bildirilmesi gerektiğini düşündüğünüzü kısaca açıklayın.

Lütfen bu cevabın neden bildirilmesi gerektiğini kısaca açıklayın.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Anyone tried mergerfs with macFUSE?

Title. It’s a little niche of a question, I know.

For a bit of backstory, I started doing music production in Logic as I was using a Mac at that time, but then needed to switch to Windows. I’ve tried and I just can’t get used to what’s available on Windows so I’m considering getting a Mac and remote-desktopping into it for music work. (or maybe a KVM, I dunno.) And I’m also planning my first real NAS at the same time, so I figured it would make sense to look into combining the two.

Yes, I’m aware there’s no expansion space for hard drives inside any modern Macs (perhaps save the Mac Pro, but that’s out of my price range). I’m perfectly fine with the slight speed penalty that comes with using USB.

Benzer Yazılar

Yorum eklemek için giriş yapmalısınız.

4 Yorumları

  1. Dunno, but if it isn’t Mac friend,y, could you run it under Docker and access through that route?

  2. mergerfs doesn’t work on Mac’s FUSE implementation. It would have to be ported. It’s just not a good use of time given the very small potential user base.

    As for using USB… there is more to using it than performance. USB is less stable and less featureful. SMART often doesn’t work.

  3. Not a direct response to your question, but a 2010/2012 Mac Pro 5,1 will handle the drive expansion side of this equation at the very least. Dual CPU version is adequate for heavy Logic loads.

  4. So you want to use your fancy new Mac also as a NAS and in order to do so, you want to build a weird software stack and you want to connect all of your drives over USB? Sounds like a bad idea for a bunch of reasons. A used office PC will cost you like $100 and will be able to run an OS that is better suited for this use case and will also enable you to properly connect your drives with way less cable clutter and better cooling.